NEWS CJI Gavai shoe incident Albert October 8, 2025 0 Comments

“Sanatan’s Insult Will Not Be Tolerated” | Lawyer Throws Shoe at CJI Gavai in Supreme Court; Here’s How He Responded

The courtroom drama unfolded with the speed of a Bollywood climax – a lawyer, enraged, allegedly hurled a shoe at Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud. The cry of “Sanatan’s insult will not be tolerated” echoed through the Supreme Court. Here’s the thing, though: incidents like this aren’t just sensational headlines. They are symptoms. Symptoms of a deeper unrest, a frustration that simmers beneath the surface of Indian society. So, let’s dive into why this happened, and what it reveals.

The Fury Behind the Footwear | Understanding the Motives

Initial reports suggest the lawyer’s actions stemmed from a perceived insult to Sanatan Dharma. Sanatan Dharma , often considered synonymous with Hinduism, is a complex tapestry of traditions, philosophies, and beliefs. The lawyer clearly felt something fundamental had been violated. But here’s where it gets tricky. What constitutes an “insult”? Who gets to decide? And what’s the appropriate response? It is important to note that this is a developing story, and many details are still emerging. However, we can look at similar cases in the past to better understand the current climate.

And, the specific trigger for this extreme reaction remains unclear. Was it a recent court ruling? A public statement? Or perhaps a culmination of perceived injustices? The answers, as they emerge, will be crucial to understanding the CJI Gavai shoe incident and its ramifications.

Echoes of the Past | Is This an Isolated Incident?

Sadly, no. Protests, sometimes violent, are not new to India. Whether it’s related to religious sentiments, political ideologies, or socioeconomic grievances, the country has witnessed a spectrum of reactions. Remember the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA)? Or the farmers’ agitation against the farm laws? Each event, in its own way, revealed deep-seated anxieties and frustrations within specific segments of the population.

But, this incident, occurring within the hallowed halls of the Supreme Court, takes things to a different level. It challenges the very authority and sanctity of the judicial system. It’s not just about expressing dissent; it’s about questioning the system itself. This can happen anywhere.

The Response | Balancing Justice and Proportionality

So, how did CJI Gavai respond? Reports indicate a calm and composed demeanor. Which, let’s be honest, is remarkable given the circumstances. The court proceedings continued, and the matter was likely addressed according to the law. The key here is proportionality. The law must take its course, but justice should be tempered with understanding.

But, the incident raises a much larger question: how do we, as a society, address grievances? Is violence ever justified? Is there a better way to channel anger and frustration into constructive dialogue? These are tough questions, and there are no easy answers.

Let me rephrase that for clarity, we need to be sure that there is law and order.

The incident definitely caused some disturbances in the Supreme court proceedings .

Beyond the Headlines | What Does This Mean for India?

Here’s the thing that fascinates me. This courtroom disruption highlights the fragility of social harmony in a diverse nation like India. It underscores the need for open dialogue, mutual respect, and a robust mechanism for addressing grievances. We, as a nation, need to move beyond knee-jerk reactions and engage in meaningful conversations. Conversations that acknowledge different perspectives, address underlying anxieties, and promote understanding.

And, it’s not just about the government or the courts. It’s about each and every one of us. It’s about being more tolerant, more empathetic, and more willing to listen to those with whom we disagree. The incident may have been sparked by religious sentiments, but the underlying issues are much broader. They touch upon issues of social justice, economic inequality, and political representation.

There were a lot of reactions to shoe throwing incident as it challenged the judicial system of the country. There were many people who had something to say about it.

Moving Forward | A Path Towards Reconciliation

What fascinates me is this – we need to start by acknowledging the pain and frustration that fuels such extreme actions. We need to create spaces for dialogue, where people can express their concerns without fear of judgment or retribution. And we need to ensure that the legal system is fair, impartial, and accessible to all.

However, as per the guidelines, the information is still developing, and there is not a lot of data present on the matter. It’s best to keep checking the official portal, as the official confirmation is still pending.

Ultimately, it’s about building a more inclusive and just society, where everyone feels heard, valued, and respected. That’s easier said than done, of course. But it’s a goal worth striving for.